Christian
Churches of God
No. QSC
Summary of the Commentary on the Qur’an or Koran
(Edition 3.0 20180610-20191026-20220111)
The
Summary is dedicated to developing the Chronological Order of the Qur’an and
its theological development in the mission to the pagan worshippers of the god
Baal or Hubal and the goddess centred on the Ka’bah.
Christian
Churches of God
E-mail: secretary@ccg.org
(Copyright © 2018, 2019, 2022 Wade Cox)
This paper may be freely copied and distributed provided it
is copied in total with no alterations or deletions. The publisher’s name and
address and the copyright notice must be included. No charge may be levied on recipients of
distributed copies. Brief quotations may
be embodied in critical articles and reviews without breaching copyright.
This paper is available from the World Wide Web page:
http://www.logon.org and http://www.ccg.org
Summary of the Commentary on the
Qur’an of Koran
Section 4
Deals with the
Late Beccan Surahs and the place of the Demons in the Host following on from
the place of the 70 and the position and role of Noah. The texts then go on to
address the Divine Unity and the errors of the Beccans. The numbering in the
sequence was also important. These texts
were to incite the Beccans further and force the Hijrah in 622.
Late Beccan
Surahs
SS 64 (Last year, 621or 2 or 1 AH),
72 (re the Jinn and ties back to 70 and 71 etc.).
006, 010 (+3vv AH), 011(-v 114), 012, 013, 014,
016 (-v. 110 + 2AH), 022 (much belongs to the Late
Beccan Period but vv. 11-13. 25-30, 39-41 and 58
60 were reportedly from Madinah).
023, 028 (vv 85 and 52-55 AH), 029).
Late Beccan
Surahs
64 (Last year, 621or 2 or 1 AH)
Mutual Loss and Gain Commentary on the Koran: Surah 64 (No. Q064)
The Surah At-Taghabun
takes its name from the Day of Judgment in verse 9 which is deemed to be a day
of mutual disillusion or of loss to the sinners and gain to the believers who
obey God.
It is considered as being from the First year of
the Hijrah but is a late Beccan Surah as verses 14ff. are taken as being
indicative of the pressure brought to bear by wives and families to prevent
Muslims from leaving Becca in the Hijrah of 622 CE.
Surah 72 (re the Jinn
and ties back to 70 and 71 etc.)
The Jinn Commentary
on the Koran: Surah 72 (No. Q072)
Al-Jinn has a number of applications and can refer
to the elemental Spirits of the Heavenly Host and then refer to the demons in
rebellion to God and also to those under their influence in the nations. Thus
the Arabs referred to them as “clever foreigners” in relation to those humans
of the Nations. It is a later Beccan Surah attributed
to the return of the Prophet from his failed mission to the Ta’if.
The reference to the nations under the Jinn are to
those under the rulers appointed by Eloah in
Deuteronomy 32, and where the nation of Israel was placed under the Christ as
the future ruler of the world as we see in verse 8 and also the (Morning) Star
that was to come out of Jacob in Numbers 24:17. This is referred to as the
Surah Al-Tarikh (or Tariq) “The Morning
Star” (Surah 86) below, dealing with the death of the Christ. The Masoretic Text (MT) of 32:8 was altered to read sons of
Israel instead of sons of God as we know from the texts of the LXX and the DSS
and which has been corrected by the RSV translation team.
The traditional view was that the nations were 72, based
on the heavenly throne, and the human host was organised
in that number. So also Moses, under instruction from the Yahovah of Israel we
know to be the Christ, organised the elders of Israel
into the Sanhedrin at Sinai, referred to as the Seventy but always organised as 72. In the same manner the church was ordained
as the Seventy in Luke 10:1 and 17 (cf. Fate of the Twelve Apostles (No.
122B)) but always it was written as the Hebdomekonta
(Duo) in the Koine Greek, which was Seventy (Two) as
the leadership of the church from over the two thousand years of the Forty
Jubilees in the wilderness. The apostles and prophets and elders of the faith
became the 144,000 and the Great Multitude of the First Resurrection.
This Surah on the Jinn is placed in its order and is
numbered as 72 in the Koran based on the significance of the number of nations
and their placement under the Demons or Jinn of the god of this world, who is
Satan (for the time being) (2Cor. 4:4). It is part of the seal of the elect and
the church at Becca.
Surahs 006, 010 (+3vv AH), 011(-v 114), 012, 013, 014, 016
(-v. 110 + 2AH), 022 (much belongs to the Late Beccan Period but vv. 11-13.
25-30, 39-41 and 58-60 were reportedly from Madinah).
006 Livestock Commentary on the Koran: Surah 6 (No.
Q006)
Surah
6 derives its name “Livestock” or “Cattle” from a word in verse 137 repeated in
verses 139, 140 where cattle are mentioned in relation to superstitious practices,
as we saw from S.5 with the
four categories of cattle used by the paganised Arabs. The main thrust in those
texts refers to the murder of the children of the people whilst in the bellies
of the women and condemns abortion and the sacrifice of the children which was
a standard practice at Mecca and the Middle East over the millennia both before
and after Christ and very nearly ended the life of the Prophet as we see here.
The term “livestock” really refers to the sheep and the goats and shows the
extension of the unity of God to the salvation of mankind as the sheep of the
Resurrection.
The
sheer immensity of the conversions saw that the pagans overran Islam and
corrupted it with their practices, as they did in Christianity. However, the purity of the message is able to
be retained by the strict adherence to the Scriptures on which the Qur’an is
built.
Pickthall
holds that with the possible exception of nine verses, which some authorities,
such as Ibn Salamah, ascribe to the Madinah period, the whole of this Surah
belongs to the year before the Hijrah. Ibn Abbas claims that it was revealed on
the authority of one visitation.
It
follows the Fifth Surah because it deals with the sequence of the divine revelation
concerning the place of the Messiah in the faith and then the allocation of the
priesthood under Messiah as high priest in the Service of the One True God and
the faith in His Service.
The
Surah is concerned with the Divine Unity. There is only One True God Eloah and
He sent Jesus Christ (Jn. 17:3). Eloah created the heavens and the earth (Job
38:4-7) and then sent Christ for the recreation in Genesis 1 when the earth
became Tohu and Bohu for He did not create it that way, as we are told in Isaiah
45:18.
The
Surah is held to be a late Beccan Surah.
Some hold that the note of certain triumph sounded in the circumstances
of the struggles of 13 years which saw the prophet and the body at Becca forced
to flee Becca and seek help in the hands of strangers at Medina, to be quite
remarkable. Most do not appear to understand the spirituality and core unity of
the faith.
This
Surah is a reprimand to the people of Becca and the half converted Arabs and a
warning of that which is to come. Whilst they made a later pretence, they are
yet to face the nexus of the Law of God under the Witnesses and the wrath of
the Messiah and the Councils of the Church of God to come.
Becca
and the pagan Arabs never got rid of the idolatry at Becca, which was in the
hands of the Arabicised Arabs of Ishmael. Nor did the Baal worshippers of
Israel and the Mother goddess system of Easter ever eradicate their idolatry
from the lands to which they moved all over the world.
The god Hubal most
prominently appeared at Mecca,
[Becca – Ed.] where an image of him was worshipped at the site of the Kaaba
(or Kaabah). According to Karen Armstrong, the sanctuary was dedicated
to Hubal, who was worshipped as the greatest of the 360 idols the Kaaba
contained, which probably represented the days of the year.[1] The Wikipedia record.
The shrine
reportedly contained many idols internal to it. Hubal as a name is associated
with Baal worship. Philip K.
Hitti, who relates the name Hubal to
an Aramaic word for spirit, suggests that the worship of Hubal was imported to
Mecca [Becca – Ed.] from the north of
Arabia, possibly from Moab or Mesopotamia.[8] Hubal
may have been the combination of Hu, meaning "spirit" or
"god", and the Moab god Baal meaning "master" or "lord".
Outside South Arabia, Hubal's name appears just once, in a Nabataean inscription;[9]
Hisham Ibn Al-Kalbi's Book
of Idols describes
the image as shaped like a human, with the right hand broken off and replaced
with a golden hand.[2] According to Ibn Al-Kalbi, the image
was made of red agate,
whereas Al-Azraqi, an early Islamic commentator,
described it as of "cornelian pearl".
Al-Azraqi also relates that it "had a vault for the sacrifice" and
that the offering consisted of a hundred camels. Both authors speak of seven
arrows, placed before the image, which were cast for divination, in cases of death, virginity, and
marriage.[2]
The deity seems to
have originated in Iraq at Hit and the process of using arrows for divination,
a practice followed by the pagan Arabs, was used in the Second and First
millennia BCE.
The Ka’aba (or
Kaabah) is to this day used for the pagan practice of the Seven
circumambulations of the shrine used as the axis mundi or centre of rotations
according to the mystical rites of the animist pagans of Arabia posing as Islam
(cf. the work Cox W.E, Mysticism CCG Publishing
2000).
“According to Ibn
Al-Kalbi, the image was first set up by Khuzaymah ibn-Mudrikah ibn-al-Ya's'
ibn-Mudar, but another tradition, recorded by Ibn Ishaq, holds that Amr
ibn Luhayy, a leader of the Khuza'a tribe, put an image of Hubal into the Kaabah,
where it was worshipped as one of the chief deities of the tribe.[3] The
date for Amr is disputed, with dates as late as the end of the fourth century
AD suggested, but what is quite sure is that the Quraysh later became the protectors
of the ancient holy place, supplanting the Khuza'a. The prophet himself was of
the Quraysh.” (cf. Wikipedia art.)
“A tale recorded
by Ibn Al-Kalbi has Muhammad's grandfather Abdul Mutallib vowing
to sacrifice one of his ten children. He consulted the arrows of Hubal to find
out which child he should choose. The arrows pointed to his son Abd-Allah,
the future father of Muhammad. However, he was saved when 100 camels were
sacrificed in his place. According to Tabari,
Abdul Mutallib later also brought the infant Muhammad himself before the
image.”[4]
After defeat by
Muhammad's forces at the Battle of Badr, Abu Sufyan ibn Harb,
leader of the Quraysh army, is said to have called on Hubal for support to gain
victory in their next battle, saying "Show your superiority, Hubal".[5] When
Muhammad conquered Mecca in
630, [Becca – Ed.] he removed and had destroyed the statue of Hubal, along with
the other 360 images at the Kaaba(h), and dedicated the structure to Allah.[6]
There may be some
foundation of truth in the story that Amr travelled in Syria and had brought
back from there the cults of the goddesses ʻUzzāʼ and Manāt, and had combined it with that of
Hubal, the idol of the Khuza'a.[7] According
to Al-Azraqi, the image was brought to Mecca [Becca and later transported to
Mecca – Ed.]
There is no connection
whatsoever between the origin of the names of these pagan deities and the name
of Allah’ which derives from the Eastern Aramaic and the prior Biblical
Chaldean Elahh and the Hebrew Eloah from which the Western Aramaic originated
(see the paper the Name of God in Islam (No. 054)).
We see from the text that the One True God Eloah or Allah’ created the
heavens and the earth (cf. Job 38:4-7) and the heavenly host of the sons of God
and the Morning Stars were present there. Genesis 1:1 shows that it was The One
True God that was creator but that the earth became tohu and bohu or waste
and void (v. 2). God says through Isaiah that God did not create it waste and
void. It became that way. The elohim were then sent to earth to reform it and
create Adamic mankind.
Eloah
or Allah’ was alone and singular and the name admits of no plurality. Then He
decided to create and He created the Sons of God as elohim and thus became Ha
Elohim or The God as the centre of a plural entity as the family of God (see
the paper How God Became a Family (No. 187)).
He
extended Himself and through the Holy Spirit He became Elohim as the central
power as Ha Elohim or The Elohim or Yahovih (SHD 3069) and all of the elohim
bore the name Yahovah when they
became Messengers to mankind after their creation as “He causes to be” or
Yahovah (SHD 3068). They were named as Malak or “malaikat” meaning Messengers
which became Aggleos in Greek and hence became termed Angels. This became a
noun as a name for the Angelic Host. The sons of God as elohim were created
beings of Eloah or Allah’ as One True God who alone was immortal (1Tim.
6:16).
Both
Christ and Gabriel were created sons of God as was Satan or Iblis. Iblis
objected to the creation of mankind as the second element of the Host. Iblis,
Azazel or Satan interfered with the creation and condemned man to death and the
resurrection through the death and resurrection of Christ. These acts were
predestined from before the foundation of the world.
In
this Surah we see the sequence from the creation of the earth to the creation
of mankind and the position of the Heavenly Host and the place of Christ and
the sons of Adam as the “Sheep” or “Livestock” of the creation that proceed
from the First Resurrection with the “Goats” of the world moving to the “Second
Resurrection”.
These
Surahs move from the beginning in Surahs 1 and 2 under the Messiah and the
Sanctification of the Elect and the Temple of God. It proceeds through the
Reddish or Adamic Heifer and then Golden Heifer through the process we saw with
Moses before the Angel of the Presence in Sinai who was Christ (1Cor.
10:4). The text then goes to the
sequence of the Priesthood at Surah 3 from The Family of Imram and then to the
place of the church at Surah 4 in families. Surah 5 “The Feast” or “Table
Spread” deals with the Sacraments of the church among the elect at the Lord’s
Supper and Passover and the death of Christ. In Surah 6 we proceed to the Unity
of God that prepares us all to become elohim as we are shown in Psalm 82:6 and
Zechariah 12:8 and John 10:34-36. We are all to become elohim or the plurality of the sons of God, as gods or elahhin in
the Chaldean, from which the Arabic is developed, through the Eastern Aramaic.
We are all enabled in this process by the Holy Spirit. In this process we are
all the Sheep of the Host as the body of Christ and the Surahs explain this
process with its cross references to the Scriptures.
Surah
7: “The Heights” then goes on to the opposition to God’s Will by Satan and then
through the sequence of Creation.
The
outline of the plan of Salvation is also developed through subsequent Surahs,
such as “The Ranks” and “Those Who Set the Ranks”.
The
Hadith was designed to destroy this understanding and separate the Scriptures
from the Qur’an. It was designed by the Jews and the paganised Arabs with the
major attacks on the Pauline documents aided by the post-Exilic Jews and the
Talmud and Hillel. It is about to be destroyed completely as a system.
So
also the Gnostics and the Baal and Easter Sunday worshippers have done their
best to destroy the understanding of the Faith and the Law of God and the
Testimony. Anyone who says that they are Christians or Muslims (which should be
interchangeable terms) and the law is done away and that when they die they go
to heaven are not to be believed. They are neither Muslims nor Christian (cf.
also Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho,
LXXX).
010
Yunis or Jonah Commentary
on the Koran: Surah 10 (No. Q010)
Surah
10 “Yunis” or “Jonah” is a late Beccan
Surah delivered in the last four years before the Hijrah
(i.e. Post 618 to 622 CE). It derives its name from a reference to the prophet
Jonah in verse 98 referring to the repentance and salvation of Nineveh: “If
only there had been a community (of those that were) destroyed of old that
believed and profited by its belief as did the folk of Jonah.”
The
reference to Jonah is not a throwaway line. Messiah told us that no sign
would be given the church save that of the prophet Jonah. The entire sign
covers from Jonah’s warning to Nineveh and their repentance and then Messiah’s
warning to Judah and their failure to repent, and their destruction at the end
of 40 years with the complete destruction of the Temple and Jerusalem on 70 CE
and the closure of the Temple in Egypt at Heliopolis by 71 CE by order of
Vespasian. The church was begun with the baptism of Christ and the selection
of the Apostles in 27 CE with the mission of John the Baptist for one day’s
journey and then the two years preaching of Messiah from 28 to 30 CE, and then
the Three days and Three nights of Messiah in the Belly of the Earth as Jonah
was in the belly of the great fish. Both died and both were resurrected.
Nineveh was given 40 days and repented. Judah was given 40 years to 70 CE
and did not repent and was destroyed. The end of the 40 Jubilees and the time
frame will be complete by 2027 (see The Sign of Jonah and the History
of the reconstruction of the Temple (No. 013)).
This
Surah is a warning to the Arabs over their future idolatry. The rejection of
the other prophets and the Biblical texts was to cost them their place in the
First Resurrection. We will see in this Surah how there are messengers to be
sent all over the world from Christ and the Apostles and over the 40 Jubilees
from his ordination of the Seventy at Judea in 28-29 CE. In this way the church
sent prophets to every corner of the known world and then beyond. He also
warned them of obeying the prophets of God which they ignored and invented the
idolatrous shirk that Muhammad (which was in fact the council of the
church of which the Prophet was chairman and leader) was the (only) prophet of
God in contradiction to this Surah.
The
Prophet is directing the comments to those who disregard the instructions in
the Koran. He then goes on to address the people who are the ones not converted
in Islam who disregard the Commandments of God and the Faith and Testimony of
the Messiah and indeed the proper calendar of the Church of God (cf. also S9
above) as undertaken in the Temple system and under Messiah and the Apostles.
It was in effect a prophecy of both the Hadithic
total corruption of Islam and its calendar and the later Church Calendar which
came to use the Babylonian intercalations in Hillel from the Jews that entered
the Churches of God in the 20th and 21st centuries.
The
Surah takes God’s direction from the Creation in the faith and the
establishment of the sun and moon as regulator of God’s Calendar (No. 156)
and the purpose of the Messiah as mediator between God and man by the explicit
direction of God. No one else can be mediator without the express direction of
God.
The Surah then goes on to explain the purpose of the calling.
These verses refer to the “Wise Scripture.” In other words the Surah is
referring back to Biblical Scripture and the Laws of God.
The
Prophet (formerly Abu Qasim) was a baptised
authorised officer of the Church of God established by Christ and the Apostles
which church had been established in the early First century from 30 CE. The
Prophet was given the gift of prophecy as messenger to Arabia. Beforehand the
Apostles and the 70 had been sent all over Parthia and India and the East
including Arabia and the Middle East. The Pagans had resisted it from that
time. However, we had sent officers all over the world from the 70 and then
later many centuries before the church grew into the force it became at Becca
and Medina. Archbishop Meuses of Abyssinia had
established the church in China from India in the Fourth century. However, by
1850 they had become Sabellianist and thus disqualified from the First
Resurrection until they repent, as is Hadithic Islam
and as are the Binitarian/Ditheists and Trinitarians
disqualified (see the papers The Fate of the Twelve Apostles
(No. 122B); General
Distribution of the Sabbath-keeping Churches (No. 122) and Role of the Fourth Commandment in
the Historical Sabbath-Keeping Churches of God (No. 170)).
Hud Commentary on the Koran: Surah 11
(No. Q011)
This
Surah 11 “Hud” takes its name from verse 50 which begins the story of Hud of
the tribe of A’ad, one of the prophets of Arabia who is not mentioned in the
Scriptures either OT or NT. The text also has the story of two other Arab
prophets; Salih of the tribe of Thamud and Shu’eyb of Midian. Jethro of Midian
is mentioned in the OT but Shu’eyb is not. However, Jethro as father-in-law of
Moses is indisputably listed as a priest of God in Midian. Pickthall states
Shu’eyb is identified with Jethro and states that he, Noah and Moses were
identified with Divine Revelation. Thus Surah 11 takes over the story and the
truth is vindicated in a manner supplementary to Surah 10.
It
should be noted that Job was written prior to the Torah and the people noted in
Job were mentioned in the texts of the Torah. Job himself was a man of
the tribe of Issachar and he must have left Egypt prior to the persecution of
Israel and taken up residence in Arabia and perhaps in Midian.
It
is regarded as a late Beccan Surah (i.e. pre 622) except for verse 114f. which
was revealed at Al-Medinah. These texts relate to the prophets and the warnings
that the demons and mankind together are given and that they both will be sent
to Sheol (hell) i.e. to the grave.
The text shows the
end problems of Islam by virtue of its paganised system.
As we understand,
the Church of God established the Arabian branch in Arabia through the groups
that had been there after the spread of the church into Syria, and out north
into what is now Iran and into the Northern elements of the Parthian Empire
into Georgia and Armenia and the areas around the Black Sea.
As we have
explained previously a man named Qasim ibn Abdullah (or Abd Allah’) ibn
Abdul-Muttalib bin Hashim, of the tribe of Qureysh of Ishmael of the Arabicised
Arabs among the Arabs of the sons of Keturah, was taught the faith by his
wife’s family and taught to read. He is thought to have been initially a
Nestorian (Abu Qasim) but was baptised into the Church of God sometime after
608 CE. He became one of the Muhammad which was the name of the Council of the
Church of God in Arabia. In other words he was made an elder of the Church of
God and appointed to its governing body. The structure and his background and
identity are discussed in the papers Introduction to the Commentary on
the Koran: Prologue (QP), Introduction to the Commentary on the
Koran (No. Q001) and the paper Descendants of Abraham Part
III: Ishmael (No. 212C).
The church lasted
only three generations through the Four Rightly Guided Caliphs and
after that was taken over by the paganised Arabs and the Shia split was forced
with the barbaric execution of the grandson of the Prophet Ali and of Hussein.
The writings of the Church known as the Muhammad were collected and formed what
is known as the Qur’an or Koran. They were meant to be read as a commentary on
the faith in Arabia and based on the Scriptures before them, both OT and NT.
These (Sabbatarian Unitarian) churches were referred to as the “People of the
Book” and they were recognised in the Koran as the supreme authority of the
meaning of the Scriptures and of the faith.
The paganised
Arabs then began writing a series of false documentation which became the
ongoing commentary on the Koran in much the same way as the Talmud was
developed on the Mishnah over the third and subsequent centuries to destroy the
effect of Scripture. This was called the Hadith, referred to also as the Sunna,
and became the basis of Sunni Islam. The Jews themselves had converted Arab
tribes that tried to completely destroy the church in Arabia and the head of
the church, the Muhammad, who was the prophet Qasim ibn Abdullah, was forced to
take up arms against them in order to survive. This was part of the Pergammos
Era.
The western
elements in the Middle East were in Anatolia and extended to the Taurus
Mountains. They were known as Paulicians and they and the Muhammad of Arabia
had to take up arms simply to survive as they were attacked by the Byzantine
so-called Christians at Constantinople and the Paganised Arabs in the East in
Iraq and Arabia. This is intimated in the comments in Revelation chapter 2
where the Messiah, the Christ, is said to come against them with the sword of
his mouth because they had become corrupted.
The war in Islam
stems from the seizure of the faith by these paganised Arabs, using the Hadith
or the Sunna, and they were resisted by the Shia faction which also lost the
understanding of the faith due to these influences in much the same way as the
Jews had and as the Christians had in their divisions from the Trinitarians to
Nestorians.
The rapid spread
of Islam had also exposed it to the corrupting influences of the Indians and
the Chinese and we will see how the original teachings were corrupted and in
that examination we will once again look at the teachings of the Church as laid
out in the Koran.
It
is for these reasons that Modern Hadithic and Shia Islam cannot survive.
Yusuf or Joseph Commentary on the Koran: Surah 12
(No. Q012)
This Surah is the
only single topic Surah in the Koran or Qur’an dealing with the story of Joseph
son of Jacob in the Bible. He was the father of Ephraim and Manasseh and played
a very important part in the development of Egypt at the beginning of the
sojourn there. The story reveals some detail in the historical traditions or
the revelation of the matter to the Arabian prophet and has significance for
the tribes of Joseph in the last days also. It also deals with Jacob as a
prophet and the issues of God’s revelation to him and the control of that
revelation.
Tradition states
the Surah was revealed at Becca to the first converts of Yathrib (Al Madinah)
in the Second year before the Hijrah. Noldeke points out, and Pickthall
records, that it may have been revealed long before then but was given to them
at that time. Often prophets are given information but restrained from issuing
the details until much later, or to reissue the details when needed. It is
certain that he was told the story when being instructed in the Scriptures.
In this instance
Jacob was not taken in by the other sons’ tales of the death of Joseph, but God
withheld his location and circumstances from Jacob, his father. There is no
doubt from the Bible text that Jacob was a prophet and he had great
understanding of the structure of the Host and the place of the Elohim or Angel
of the Presence as the being responsible for Israel and the sons of Abraham and
that he understood the fate not only of the sons of Joseph but also their
critical importance to the nations and the calling of the gentiles in the
latter days when he says that Ephraim shall be a company of nations (cf. Gen.
48:15-20). This Angelic being of the Host became Jesus or Isa the Christ or
Messiah who was the star that was to come out of Jacob and who was the high
priest of Melchisdek, whom the prophet also served (Num. 24:17).
We see that the
Arabian Prophet is quoting Scripture and is stating that it is explained in
Arabic so it is made plain to them.
The Thunder Commentary on the Koran: Surah 13
(No. Q013)
Surah
13 Ar Ra’d takes its name from verse 13. The texts in 12 and 13
sing the praise of the Messiah in the creation. The text of the Surah concerns
Divine Guidance and the relationship of consequence flowing from the breaches
of the Laws of God. There is no respect of persons with God in relation to His
Laws and punishment flowing from their breach. Reward and punishment are the direct
result of obeying or rejecting Divine Laws. However, Satan under his rule
broke the nexus of the Laws of God and it rains on the just and the unjust.
That nexus will be restored in the near future.
As a
result of the Hadithic rejection of Scripture this text has to be explained as
applying to natural law as though they do not reflect the Nature of God, which
reflects itself in the Laws of God coming from His Nature.
Authorities are
divided as to whether it is a Beccan Surah with two verses given at Al-Madinah
or entirely a Madinan Surah with two verses given at Becca. Pickthall is
of the opinion that the very division of opinion favours a Meccan [Beccan] origin
as he considers there could be no such division of opinion concerning a
complete Madinan origin owing to the great number of witnesses. He holds it is
a late Meccan [Beccan] Surah for the most part.
The reality is
that the position on the law was a standard view of the Churches of God and
they were reminded of it continually. It was only with the Hadith that the law
was undermined, as was the law undermined with the Trinitarians and
Binitarian/Ditheists, which the Koran systematically condemns.
It is no
coincidence that the position in the Koran at Surah 13 reflects the system of
Rebellion against the Laws of God that was, and was to be a feature of the Arab
peoples, and the world generally (cf. the paper Symbolism of Numbers (No. 007)).
The preceding twelve Surahs concern the creation, the position of Messiah and
the elect, and the prophets acting as messengers to mankind in the rebellion
and mankind’s refusal to follow the Laws of God.
Ibrahim or Abraham Commentary on the Koran: Surah 14
(No. Q014)
Surah 14 derives
its name (Ibrihim) from Abraham’s prayer in verses 35-41. It was stated
to be uttered from the time when he was establishing his son Ishmael in the
valley of Becca, Pickthall considers Ishmael to be the ancestor of the Arabs
but he was not. He was the ancestor of the Arabicised Arabs, and the sons of
Keturah were the progenitors of the Arabs.
It is similar to
other Beccan Surahs and the subject of verse 46 being the plot of the
idolaters, indicates it was perhaps one of the last of the Beccan Surahs before
the Hijrah. Verses 28-30 are considered later additions from Al-Madinah.
Once again it is
listed as Scripture but as a revelation to the Prophet.
The Bee Commentary on the Koran: Surah 16
(No. Q016)
The Surah An-Nahl
“The Bee” derives its name from verses 68ff. referring to the Bee and its
activities and produce. The sequence refers to the providence of God in the
creation and the provision of all produce, including strong drink such as wine
and mead in the creation. His guidance is necessary to mankind in
managing the creation and its rejection is as unwise as rejecting food and
drink.
The Surah is
ascribed to the last Beccan group but some authorities ascribe verses 1-40 to Becca
and the later verses as being from Al-Madinah. The only verse that is of
evident Madinan origin is verse 110. Here the Muslims were recorded as having
fought.
In the Beccan
period the Muslims were constrained from fighting. Many of the Beccan period
were forced to flee and take refuge in Abyssinia (cf. Pickthall). There was a
strong Sabbatarian church there from the Fourth century under Archbishop Meuses
(see the paper General
Distribution of the Sabbath-keeping Churches (No. 122)).
However, their
very survival depended on their taking up arms from the Hijrah in 622 and it
became more and more necessary for their survival. However, their
dominance emerged from this military change in doctrine and thus the latter
section from verse 110 and perhaps many others had to be from 2 AH (623/4CE)
and thus Medinan.
The Surah follows
on from Surah 15 Al Hijr as a continuation of the warning to the Arab peoples
and all who follow them. The Semites were all warned from the prophets down
from Hud and Salih to the A’ad and Thamud and to Lot and Abraham to Sodom and
Gomorrah, and then through Moses and the Biblical prophets and on to Messiah
and the Apostles who warned them all, as we see in the many previous Surahs.
They, and the
idolatrous Churches of God, are now to be warned again for the last time in
this work and then they will be dealt with by the Witnesses, Enoch and Elijah,
and then by the Messiah himself immediately afterwards (cf. The Witnesses (including the Two
Witnesses) (No. 135)).
The primary
warning of the Surah comes to those of Becca and the idolatry centred there.
The warnings may well have produced the conflict that forced the Hijrah. The
warning is at first an exaltation of the One True God Eloah above the elohim.
There is no room for Binitarianism or Ditheism or Trinitarianism in this text
as in all others in the Koran.
The worship of the
god Baal and the goddess Ashtoreth or Easter was taken to Mecca as the god
Hubal or “The Baal” meaning “the Lord” and centred on the Ka’aba with the 360
idols of the rulers of the day in the prophetic year. It was also associated
with child sacrifice (cf. Binitarian
and Trinitarian Misrepresentation of the Early Theology of the Godhead (No.
127B)).
The Bee is the
symbol of the Mother Goddess. The Surah strikes at the idolatry associated with
that system in the Levant and centred on Syria and in Becca/Petra and later Mecca
with the god Baal or Hubal and the goddess there.
At
Ephesus the many-breasted goddess Artemis was attended by Essene (meaning King
Bees) who remained celibate during their period of service even though some
were married. This is probably the reason Pliny referred to the community at
Qumran as Essene. They would have rejected this label. Celibacy of the clergy
entered Christianity from Gnosticism and these cults. The term Father was
a rank of the Mithras system and was actually forbidden by Jesus Christ to be
applied to Christians (Mat. 23:9). Hence why Qasim had to be Nestorian firstly
(as Abu Qasim) and then Sabbatarian or it was simply a misguided application by
the ignorant of the Arabs..
The
females of the Ishtar cult were not celibate but promiscuous. Artemis and Diana
were both patrons of fertility and fruit trees. It seems that Artemis and Diana
were associated as the same deity and hence the crowd at Acts cried Great
is Diana of Ephesus, when in fact the ancient name in Ephesus was
Artemis, and Diana was the name used elsewhere.
Dionysius
was also god of fruit trees and we begin to see an intertwined relationship in
these fertility and Mystery cults.
As
Queen of May, the Mother goddess, was representative of the spirit of
vegetation. This was prevalent in Europe and Britain.
The
Mother goddess was also goddess of the corn (a term for any grain).
See
also the papers on Origins
of Christmas and Easter (No. 235) and Article on Christmas and Easter
(No. 236).
However,
many Essene priests were celibate (some were eunuchs) and also abstemious and
the Surah identifies this aspect and points out that the grapes were made for
strong drink and the Bee itself produces strong drink (as mede or mead). It is
from this idolatry and the desire to undermine the Lord’s Supper, Bread and
Wine and the Passover that this custom of abstinence has become part of the idolatrous
rituals of Hadithic Islam. See also the paper Wine in the Bible (No. 188)
and also Vegetarianism and
the Bible (No. 183).
So also the Mosques
that originated from Mecca and around the world were symbolic of the idolatry
of the Baal and Easter or Ashtoreth systems. The roofs of the Mosques were
shaped as the Breasts of the goddess and the Minarets were shaped as the
Phallus of the god Hubal. Initially they were the symbols of the crescent of
the horns of the Moon God Qamar or Sin on the breasts of the sun goddess Shams
with the star of the goddess as Venus. They are there to this day and on their
flags. These were also represented by, or as, the bens or Ben Bens of the
obelisks in Egypt. These were also central or world poles of the fertility
cults and are prohibited by Eloah in Scripture. So also were the Asherah or
poles of the goddess. They were spread from the Sidonians to the Arabian Desert
and to Becca/Petra and Mecca (cf. 1Kgs. 11:33; 2Kgs. 23:13).
As is usual in
ancient pagan animism the idol or world tree, acting as the Axis Mundi, was
used as the centre of worship in which the devotees circumambulated in
sequences of five or seven or nine as decreed. In Mecca the circumambulations
of the Ka’aba were seven in the worship of Hubal and the only thing that has
changed in all these centuries is that the 360 idols have been removed
(although retained symbolically in architecture surrounding the Ka’aba). The
Ka’aba is still there and the devotees still do seven circumambulations and
they also proceed to the stoning of Satan in ritual. Many are often killed
during these pagan rituals that are still carried on under the guise of Islam,
which they are not. These aspects are explained in the work Mysticism Chapter 1 (B7_1).
The Pilgrimage Commentary on the Koran: Surah 22
(No. Q022)
Surah 22 Al
Hajj is given the name “The Pilgrimage” from the assumption that the text
in verses 26-38 refers to a pilgrimage to the idolatrous house in Mecca as a
central place of worship, which it cannot do. The text actually refers to
the Feasts of God of the Bible texts and the requirements of the laws of God.
The Churches of God, after the fall of the Temple in 70 CE, saw the dispersion
of the Jews. From the move of the church to Ephesus the feasts were kept
wherever the church decided that God was to place His hand as the place of
worship and that would continue until the Return of the Messiah and the
re-establishment of the Temple at Jerusalem. All nations will send their
representatives to Jerusalem under the Messiah or the nations will be punished
and destroyed (Zech. 14:16-19).
Abraham had
determined the early place of worship by the naming of the place as Bethel or
the House of God. He also allocated the centrality of worship at
Jerusalem with the tithing to Shem as priest of Melchisedek (No. 128). He
also dedicated Beersheba as the “well of the oath” where he swore the oath of
the covenant. God had sworn through the prophet Zechariah that Jerusalem
was the centre of worship and would be under the Messiah at his return.
Zechariah Chapter 2 shows that the One True God sends the Messiah to Jerusalem
to redeem it from the idolaters in the Last Days and the Bible is absolutely
clear that the world will be run from there forever as will be the universe be
run from there after the Second
Resurrection and the Great White Throne Judgment (No. 143B). The
Prophet also stated that to be the case in the Surah on the “Night Journey”
where Jerusalem was made the centre of the faith. The Koran cannot contradict
the sheer volume of the Scriptures that state that as fact and thus this
supposition by the Meccan idolaters is false and we will explain what the real
meaning and intent is during the Surah.
Pickthall holds,
from his copy, which is dated from the days of the Ottoman Empire ascribing it
to the Al-Madinah period that is in fact the case. That is quite recent in the
period. However, it is by no means certain as it was located there in
order to establish Mecca as the place of Pilgrimage, which it was not.
Pickthall holds that verses 11-13, 25-30, 39-41 and 58-60 were all revealed at
Al-Madinah. Noldeke agrees with that ascription from the nature of their
contents but holds that much of the Surah belongs to the last Beccan period.
All of this stems from the assumption that the “pilgrimage” is to be at Mecca,
which contradicts Scripture entirely.
That is why the
Hadithic writers have to blasphemously claim that the Scriptures have been lost
and the current texts must be disregarded.
There seems little
doubt that S22:36 has a serious problem in that it refers to the sacrifice of
camels and their provision to the poor from their sacrifice and the consumption
of their flanks (allegedly in strips) by the poor. The Hadithic Muslims use this to justify the
sacrifice of camels at Eid. This is
contrary to Scripture and elsewhere in the Koran at S3:93. Moreover, God is not a respecter of persons
and the Law requires the provision of cattle and clean animals by the rulers of
the people for all the people at the Sabbath, New Moons and Feasts. One must consider that this text was a latter
addition very much after the Madinan period and perhaps well after the death of
the prophet to justify their slaughter of unclean camels. Some critics of the
text think it came from the Ummayad period.
It refers to dire necessity for the
poor and destitute and thus no person who is not destitute can eat them in any
case no matter how they construe the text.
Surahs 023, 028 (vv 85 and 52-55 AH),
023 The Believers Commentary on the Koran: Surah 23
(No. Q023)
Surah
23 Al- Mu’minun “The Believers” is held to be named from a word
occurring in the first verse. Certainly its subject is the triumph of the
believers and would thus be appropriately named. It is understood to be
the last Surah revealed at Becca before the Prophet’s flight to Al-Madinah in
622 CE and is thus a late Beccan Surah.
The
text of “The Believers” refers to the church and its structure. The texts from
the previous Surahs follow on to the prophets and their tasks and prophecies.
They continue on to the Believers of the Saints of the Elect in the Churches of
God.
The
comments also deal with the structure of the church in the heavens and the
construction of the Temple at Jerusalem. These seven paths are the seven steps
or the seven weeks to Pentecost and the receiving of the Holy Spirit in the
believers baptised into the Body of Christ.
"This
structure represented the Temple, which became the living Temple of the Church.
It had seven stages to the entire edifice. Six of these were one on top
of the other in the nave and the seventh was the main hall proper, which
led into the Holy of Holies. We could not enter this last stage until Christ
died and split the Temple veil and made it possible for us to enter. This is
the significance of the seven weeks to Pentecost. On this last phase the Holy
Spirit entered the Church, enabling God to become all in all. "
(cf.
the paper The Old
and the New Leaven (No. 106A)).
The
terms Third Heaven (NT), and Seventh Heaven (Qur'an) are generic.
The New Testament term refers to the classifications of the basic Atmosphere,
Solar and Galactic structure of the Earth and the heavenly structure of the
Throne of God in the “sides of the North.” The seven classifications of
the Koran are developments of these making distinction between the Atmospheres,
inner and outer space, the Solar system, the Galaxy and so on (see FAQs in Islam at (No. 055)).
These
are very important keys in understanding the Koran. Because the Church and its
function are avoided by the Hadithic commentators, the meaning of the Koran
(Qur’an) is trivialised and misconstrued so that the followers of Islam can
make no real sense out of it.
Indeed
this is the real sense of withholding the Truth of God in unrighteousness (Rom.
1:18, 25).
028 The Narration Commentary on the Koran: Surah 28
(No. Q028)
Surah 28 Al-Qasas
is called “the Story” or “the Narration” from verse 25. It was revealed at the
last phase of the persecution of the church at Becca and at the time of the
flight from Becca to Medina in 622 CE. Some Arabic writers even say that
verse 85 was revealed during the flight and verses 52-55 were claimed to be
revealed after the Flight at Al-Madinah. These texts are asserted to be edits.
Verse 85 appears to be a later Hadithic edit to divert attention from the facts
of the direction to Scripture from verses 52-55; Hence the assertion of a later
date to them; which appears spurious, given the context.
The text concerns the trials
of the life of Moses once again as we have seen from Surah 27 and those
previously that relate to the story of Moses and his persecution following the
story of the prophets and the elect and their place in the Resurrection.
Here the Surah encouraged the
church by reference to the Exodus and the intervention of God through the Angel
of the Presence given Israel as his inheritance (Deut. 32:8ff.). This Angel of
the Presence was later to become the Messiah (1Cor. 10:4).
029 The Spider Commentary on the Koran: Surah 29
(No. Q029)
Surah 29 Al-‘Ankabut “The Spider” is named from verse 41 where false beliefs
are likened to a spiders web for frailty. Most of the Surah is attributed to
the Middle or Last Beccan period. There is confusion as to the origin. Some
authorities attribute verses 7 and 8 and many others attribute the whole latter
section of the Surah to the period at Al-Madinah. It gives comfort to the
community under persecution.
In this text we again get
Haman linked with the time of Moses and again the Amalekites are tied in to the
period with Egypt. It has to be considered that Haman may have been a
traditional ancestral name of the Amalekites that Moses and the Israelites
fought in the last year of the Exodus near Kadesh. There seems little doubt
that the Prophet is tying the Arabs in as the latter day Amalekites in the last
wars of the end time persecutions.
The text introduces the
concept of testing by affliction those of the faith who believe.
q