Sabbath 27/10/33/120

Dear Friends,

Over this Sabbath and the New Moon we will examine the game being played by the Evolutionary Genetecists regarding the “Out of Africa” conjecture and the claims at extending the origin of man into the Cro-Magnons and back to 78,000 years before the present (YBP) in Africa. To do this these unscrupulous gentlemen have combined the Hamitic lineages with the other two Semitic and Japhethitic lineages and asserted that both Shem and Japheth are descended from the Hamitic lineages. This has the effect of combining the sons of Noah and using Ham to extend the lineage and by using a completely bogus Haplogroup tree they can then get back to Africa and extend the dates to 78,000 YBP which is completely false. Attention was drawn to this game and we can see the examples in sites such as www.eupedia.com.

Let us reconstruct the argument here so we might properly then demonstrate, by examining the correct DYS sequence, how the argument is bogus and the time frame much shorter than claimed, even using their false mutation sequence timetable.                                                                                                  

The argument is proposed as follows. The Original YDNA ancestor is stated as:
Y                      Allegedly in Africa 78,000 YBP
The first mutation A is not listed in the European lists. That is because Hg. A has no links whatsoever to the others and with Hg. B is exclusive to Africa and African Americans.

Impossibility of this sequence

Looking at the YDNA family tree below we can see the break-down of the tree into lineages that absolutely prohibit any such conjectural tree being formed.

Firstly we must start with the ancestral root of Noah and the basic structure of the main branches of the Hamitic Haplogroups. Hg. A was the first to mutate from the main ancestral line. Hg. A mutated in M91 and P 97? It retained none of the base link.

The ancestral line is from Noah to Japheth, Ham and Shem in the lines SRY0831, 1 M41 2, M139, M168, P9.
The other Hamitic lineages mutated into the line M60, M181, and P85? in Hg B. The main Hg. lines A and B are more or less confined to Africa and to African Americans.

The other Hamitic lineages stemming from the Central Noahide lineages at M168 and P9 formed into Hg. C at RPS4Y M216 for Cushite lineages and into Hg. DE at M145 M213 which is the YAP divide and covers Hgs. D for Tibetans and E for all Canaanite and North African lineages.

It is thus obvious that the major African lineages both A and B have nothing whatsoever to do with the other non-African lineages other than the fact that Hg. E went into and spread through North Africa and the Middle East and from there into Europe.

All lineages in the lines of Shem and Japheth spread throughout the world in the lineage from Hg. F in the mutations P14 M89 and M213 (from the FTDNA Family Tree Chart of 2005). On examination it appears that M213 was common to DE and also to F etc. but not to Hg. C. It is thus reasoned that M213 mutated to M216 in the C group and RPS4Y was also inserted and in the DE M145 was inserted prior to M213 and in the Hg. F and subsequent lineages P14 and M89 were inserted prior to the M213.Thus it might be asserted that M213 was the final section of the original Noahide lineage through Shem, Ham and Japtheth. It certainly is the correct lineage of the YDNA tree measured by science, no matter how long or short a period they claim it took to mutate. 

It is thus completely impossible for Hgs. C, D, E and F and all subsequent groups G,H, IJ and K to have come from either A or B and nor is it possible for D, E, F and subsequent groups to have come from C as claimed in these “Out of Africa” arguments.

The biblical record and the groups mutating show that the major mutations occurred in five spontaneous mutations away from the main Noahide lines. They then lapsed into subsequent mutations forming other tribal/national groups. To suggest otherwise appears to be a deliberate fraud.

It is thus obvious from their own charts that the lines and time frames are bogus and all events on their chart before 42,000 YBP are also bogus.

The suggested breakdown of the other mutations are likewise complete conjecture and also bogus. The events thus cannot be based on even the date of 42,000 YBP.

The breakdown of the lineages in the various mutations are in fact all possible from the years from 2200 BCE to the present if the falsely elongated chart is ignored and the biblical model is placed in perspective and the modern observed effects of background radiation, and mtDNA effects on the human genome are properly discussed and accounted for. Evolution is a religious myth and has to be properly accounted for and dismissed. However, to maintain the religious myth science has to be falsified and key elements overlooked or misrepresented.

This sort of misrepresentation occurs all the time. A recent case was the finds relating to the human in Russia and in Israel and referring back to the 2003 discovery of the so-called Hobbit of Flores.

The find of the finger bone in Russia in the cave in Siberia was dated to 30,000 YBP but as usual the basis of the dating was not discussed publicly. It had some unusually well preserved DNA, so it was reported.

The scientists referring to the recent finds in Russia referred back to the “Hobbit of Flores” being more than 12000 years old and some even suggested 30,000 + YBP of an ancient, and pre-modern human species. This was despite the fact that scientists have already investigated the find on Flores and proven from its YDNA that it is a modern human that degenerated due to diet on Flores and regressed in size and capacity. It was in fact an example of how not to live and how to lose your capacity as a human society.

It was nevertheless used by the scientists who either knew and deliberately misused the data, or who were too bone idle even to turn on the TV, and who certainly never researched the recent investigations on the matter. The high priests of evolution make medieval Roman Catholic monks look progressive.

The findings, reported in December 2010 in the journal Nature, confirmed that the specimen came from a young girl who was neither "modern human" nor Neanderthal. Instead she reportedly belonged to a separate, now extinct, branch of the human family tree scientists have named Denisovians, after Denisova Cave in southern Siberia where the fossil was found.

Also, it was reported that a molar tooth recovered from the cave is believed to be from a Denisovian individual. It reportedly looks different from the teeth of modern humans and Neanderthals, and allegedly more closely resembles those of much older human ancestors such as Homo Erectus.

Based on their conjecture regarding the DNA structure the scientists then go on to assert that the finds alter the story of human evolution. They then proceed to assert that the finds suggest the Neanderthals had an Asian sister group that broke away on their own evolutionary path before dying out. The fact that Neanderthals had a completely different and absolutely alien DNA system to humans is ignored and this find is then applied to the hypothesis that these pre-humans had some relationship to the pre-Adamic creation, when we know they did not.

Most scientists believe ancestors of the Neanderthals left Africa between 300,000 and 400,000 years ago to establish themselves in Europe and Eurasia. The scientists then allege the false assertion that, meanwhile, the direct ancestors of modern humans, Homo Sapiens, remained and evolved in Africa.

They allegedly headed out of Africa 70,000 to 80,000 years ago and for a time co-existed with the soon-to-be-extinct Neanderthals.

Now scientists believe the Denisovians diverged from the Neanderthals at the time of the original exodus between 300,000 and 400,000 YBP and spread east.

The scientists then, totally contrary to all DNA evidence, asserted that: “Like the Neanderthals, they appear to have interbred with modern humans.” We have more chance of breeding with a chimpanzee than a Neanderthal. At least they have an eight strand system; Neanderthals do not.
The evidence allegedly came unexpectedly when Denisovian gene sequences turned up in the DNA of modern Melanesian Pacific islanders. How would that occur, we might well ask?  Melanesian YDNA structure us based on the Hg. K sequence which we know is a direct descendant of F and exists in the sequence above. What mysterious part of this K sequence is derived in the East from Homo Erectus? Perhaps one of the Hg. K Adamic humans interbred with a pre-human relic; although there is no evidence whatsoever for this supposition.

The research suggests genetic material derived from Denisovians makes up around 4 per cent to 6 per cent of the genetic code of at least some Melanesians. Is that so? What are DYS involved and what is the basis of the assertion? Were the Melanesians Oranghutans? What is the mtDNA involved? We know for a fact that all human mtDNA stems from mtDNA Hg. L. What possible basis can they have for such an assertion? The reason they do not disclose the basis of the claims is because they are invariably false when exposed to the antiseptic of fresh air and sunlight.

This week a find in Israel of eight teeth is also alleged to be a modern ancestor of humans. They allege it is 400,000 years old. The fact is that Israel is a site of Neanderthal finds and they are all tested and bear no relation whatsoever to modern humans.

From the finds in Israel they were able to demonstrate that they cooked and ate plant and vegetables. Researchers in the US, reportedly, have found grains of cooked plant material in their teeth. The study is the first to confirm that the Neanderthal diet was not confined to meat and was more sophisticated than previously thought. The research has been published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Like most of these claims the evidence to date has been circumstantial. They were definite cannibals and chemical analysis of the bones suggested they ate little or no vegetables. This perceived reliance on meat had been put forward by some as one of the reasons these humans become extinct as large animals such as mammoths declined.

However, a new analysis, by scientists, of Neanderthal remains from across the world, has found direct evidence that contradicts the chemical studies. Researchers found fossilised grains of vegetable material in their teeth and some of it was cooked.

Although pollen grains have been found before on Neanderthal sites and some in hearths, it is only now accepted that there is clear evidence that plant food was actually eaten by these people.

“We have found pollen grains in Neanderthal sites before but you never know whether they were eating the plant or sleeping on them or what”

"But here we have a case where a little bit of the plant is in the mouth so we know that the Neanderthals were consuming the food." (Professor Alison Brooks George Washington University to BBC)

The reasons as to why the tests were wrong isolates why most of the finds are wide off the mark. They are based on assumptions that come from the preconceived notions of the analysts themselves.

According to Professor Brooks, the tests were measuring protein levels, which the researchers assumed came from meat.

"We've tended to assume that if you have a very high value for protein in the diet that must come from meat. But... it's possible that some of the protein in their diet was coming from plants," she said.

This study is held to be the latest to suggest that, “far from being brutish savages, Neanderthals were more like us than we previously thought.”

This drive to find a missing link and to link pre-Adamic humans with Adamic humans, in spite of the fact that there is absolute evidence from DNA to show beyond doubt that we had nothing to do with them or they with us, is continually ignored and suppressed to maintain the myths of the religion of Evolution.

A modern scientist with all the baggage of evolutionary theory is as hamstrung as his predecessors in the Trinitarian religious system before him. Make no mistake Evolution is a religion based on conjecture. Pray we can continue to expose these assertions for what they are.

Wade Cox
Coordinator General

Appendix A: (PDF)