Dear Friends

This last week we have seen the push towards a New World Order fall into place with another significant step.

That is called the New World Financial Order (or NWFO). At the Eurozone meeting on Sunday 12 October 2008 in Paris the Eurozone leaders agreed to pump billions of dollars into the tottering European Banks and underwrite inter-bank loans. The Current European Union head, which was the President of France Nicolas Sarkozy, claimed that the much needed unity “was what we achieved today.”

However, as Janet Albrechtson pointed out in The Australian on 15 October what Europe had in fact done was behave like a dysfunctional family. Here's what she considers the timeline of proof.

“The rebellious Irish kicked off the disunity a few weeks ago with its E400 billion ($770 billion) bank guarantee scheme for Ireland's six biggest banks. The Brits and EU honchos in Brussels were miffed that Ireland's unilateral action put pressure on others to follow suit to avoid a flood of money into Irish banks. So out came the rhetoric. After hosting a meeting of G8 leaders on Saturday, October 4, Sarkozy said that co-ordination was paramount: "What is of essence is that Europe should exist and respond with one voice."

But hang on, Nic. The next day, the Germans did their own thing, too. Having described Dublin's unilateral actions as unacceptable and complaining that ‘the Irish way is not the right way’, German Chancellor Angela Merkel snubbed Saturday's talk of EU co-operation. On Sunday, October 5, the German Government upped the ante with its E1 trillion guarantee for all private bank deposits. Not very EU-neighbourly of the Chancellor to encourage surrounding depositors to stash their money in a secure German bank. Then the Greeks moved to shore up their bank deposits. Then the Danes did it. And the Italians and the Dutch. By last Wednesday, five EU countries - Britain, Italy, France, Austria and Spain - had drawn up individual plans to prop up their banking systems with taxpayer money. Eschewing co-ordination, European countries opted for what The New York Times described as an ‘ugly disarray’ of ‘self-interested policies to protect their citizens and banks first’.

That's the problem with grand-sounding plans about EU co-operation and the "essence of Europe". In the abstract, everyone loves the vibe of the thing. Meetings are held. Hands are shaken over promises of EU solidarity. The continent must forge transnational solutions, say the solemn Europhile leaders. Click, click, go the cameras.

Then along comes a crisis and that hoary old chestnut - national interest - prevails. Every EU leader races for the door, hightails it out of Paris, and it's a case of every country for itself.

‘This is unprecedented,’ said Simon Tilford, chief economist of the Centre for European Reform, a London research organisation. ‘It has exposed the limits of European integration and co-ordination when presented with a crisis of this magnitude.’

Unprecedented, perhaps, but not surprising unless you mistakenly imagined that national self-interest became a historical relic under the EU project. Born of fine intentions in the aftermath of World War II, the EU embodied a noble idea that a European free-trade union would bind European countries through trade ties, making war between them impossible. But building a new political EU behemoth has stalled.

In June, the Irish sent a simple message to the bureaucrats in Brussels. In a referendum, 52 per cent of Irish said no to the Lisbon Treaty, the EU's latest attempt to boost its own political authority by requiring member states to cede political sovereignty to a transnational body.

The Irish were uneasy at not being able to vote for a new EU president who speaks for them. Likewise, they were concerned over an EU diplomatic corps collected under a new EU foreign affairs minister. Not to mention the treaty's attempt to give the EU (now representing 27 countries, up from 15 in 2003) the power to legislate in areas such as immigration and simultaneously reducing the number of policy areas that require unanimity from member states. In any language, that is a raid on a nation-state's sovereignty.

EU leaders slapped down the Irish for their rude rejection of the Lisbon Treaty. The unstated EU mindset was that the Irish would have to keep voting until they got the right answer.

Europhiles, who learned very little from the 2005 debacle, have a knack for not listening to the people. Back then the EU's new constitution was lauded as the ‘birth certificate of the United States of Europe’ by then German minister for Europe Hans Martin Bury. French voters said ‘non’ and the Dutch said ‘nee’. (Just as the Danes said ‘nej’ in 1992 over concerns that EU citizenship would replace national citizenship.)

So what did Europe do? Repackaged the grand-sounding constitution into a more mundane-sounding treaty. This time there was no lofty talk about the United States of Europe, only a tricky resolve to make sure the people did not have a vote on the insatiable political ambitions for the EU in case the people, once again, said no to the EU project.”

The fact is that the Irish constitution required a national vote and the Irish don’t trust Europe even though they have benefitted from the EU. UK has far less reason than the Irish. However, it has more traitors in Whitehall than there are in Dublin but no constitution to force their hand.

Albrechtson refers to the ensuing comments of Sarkozy and Merkel after the Irish “No Vote” as “Eurobabble” which is more appropriate than she perhaps realises.

They said that the Lisbon Treaty was aimed at “making Europe more democratic".

People think of democracy as their right to vote on matters of national significance. The Lisbon Treaty works in the opposite direction, “transferring power from the burghers in the suburbs to Brussels.”

As Albrechtson says “Now it seems that old-fashioned democracy and national sovereignty are back in fashion among the EU leaders, too. Sarkozy's talk of Europeans has been bumped aside by the first real financial crisis and a whole swathe of European countries has effectively given a two-finger salute to the grand idea of co-ordination under the auspices of a transnational EU model. The EU has faltered under the weight of its own haughtiness.

The reason? When countries enter EU headquarters in Brussels, they don't leave their own national interests at the door. And so it was a Utopian dream to expect nation-states to cede decision-making power in the middle of a global financial meltdown. None of this denies the fact EU leaders have managed some co-ordination to date. And, in an ideal world, wider co-ordination from European countries would deliver a more effective outcome given the intricate relationships between the financial systems of each country. But back in the real world, Sarkozy's one voice for Europe has broken apart into many different languages. National interests trump transnational interests. If EU leaders fall back on national sovereignty at the first whiff of a crisis, how can they expect their people to climb aboard the EU's grander geopolitical project?”

This is what God said to the prophet Daniel when the Babylonian Empire was to reach the final days; when in the end the union of the feet of iron and clay would be the last phase of the empire when it would be struck by the rock would come from the heavens and smash the empire into pieces. The clay weakens the legs of iron, which was the emergent Roman Empire, which was split into two sections based on Rome and Constantinople or Byzantium.

The weakness was the national interests and conflict inherent in the system.

But what of the second part of the Empire of the Last Days that was the driving force behind the Power of the Empire of the Beast. To that we look across the Atlantic to the other Military Arm of the Beast. This was the other foot of Iron and Clay.

On 19 October 2008 at Camp David Maryland it was reported that US President George W. Bush announced plans to host a summit of world leaders to discuss the global response to the financial crisis. He said that the international community had to work together.

The announcement was another concession to European leaders, who have already forced the US hand on key design elements of the financial rescue effort being implemented around the world.

It was claimed as part of the propaganda that European leaders have sought to place the blame for the financial crisis on the US, despite the fact weaknesses in European banks also have been exposed. It might be suggested that the line is to suggest that it was US banks acting in an unregulated fashion that were the cause of the collapse. What was needed was more regulation.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy, in particular, pressed for the economic summit to be held in New York City, where, he claims it all started. That is a planned situation and always had been.

It was reported from Camp David that “the US President announced he would host a summit of world leaders ‘to discuss the global response to the financial crisis and ideas to prevent such a crisis from recurring in the future and to preserve our free-market system’.

Mr Bush, meeting with Mr Sarkozy and European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, did not announce a date or site for the summit.

Mr Sarkozy suggested it be held in the shadow of Wall Street before the end of November.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon offered the UN headquarters in Manhattan as the location for the summit, which is now expected to be held before the end of the year.

The summit is likely to include the member states of the Group of Eight - the US, Japan, Germany, Britain, France, Italy, Canada and Russia - as well as some developing countries that have not traditionally had a seat at the table, such as China, India, Brazil and South Korea.

Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Switzerland and Australia also are being mentioned as possible invitees.

It was unclear last night whether Australia's Kevin Rudd had been invited to the meeting or whether he would attend. His spokesman said more information was being sought.

The weekend's developments appeared to be adding to the political momentum for European leaders, who have scored political points at home by criticising the US. They're hoping that a politically weakened Bush administration will be more likely to accept their ideas at the summit.

Still, it is unclear how much substance the meeting can produce. Overhauling the world's financial architecture - the stated aim of European leaders such as Mr Sarkozy - will take years to accomplish.

And the Bush administration remains skeptical about some of the more far-reaching ideas being floated by Europeans, notably British Prime Minister Gordon Brown's proposal for an international oversight agency for the largest financial institutions.

And with just weeks to go until Bush leaves office, the administration also will be cautious about committing the US to many specifics.

Most concrete decisions seem likely to be put off until after the new US president takes office.

Standing outside on a crisp autumn day at the helipad on the secluded presidential retreat yesterday, all three leaders spoke soberly about what Mr Bush called a ‘trying time for all our nations’.

‘As we make the regulatory and institutional changes necessary to avoid a repeat of this crisis, it is essential that we preserve the foundations of democratic capitalism - a commitment to free markets, free enterprise and free trade,’ Mr Bush said.

‘We must resist the dangerous temptation of economic isolationism and continue the policies of open markets that have lifted standards of living and helped millions of people escape poverty around the world.’

Since October 9, last year, when the Dow topped 14,000 points, investors have lost $US8.3trillion ($AU12.03 trillion) from pension funds, college savings plans, retirement accounts and other investments.

Mr Barroso said it was time for the entire international financial system to be reformed.

‘We need a new global financial order,’ he said. ‘The European Union and the US, we can make a difference together.’ “(emphasis added).

Well who would have thought we would get here? The answer is that the Bible foretold this event almost two thousand years ago and again at the beginning of the Babylonian Captivity when He gave the prophecy to Daniel through the Host.

We are about to form the corporate financial system of the Beast Power under the direction of Satan using this last Empire as the New World Order. The amazing thing is that most people are too stupid to realise what is happening to them.

In the New Moon Message in July 2008 titled the Hour of the Beast. We said what would happen in the financial crisis and what the end result would be.

This was a manufactured crisis used by politicians and bankers to suck in massive amounts of financial investment and simply absorb it by the greatest financial fraud in the history of the world using US and European banks.

This game was always the aim of the Internationalist socialists. Nazism is about national socialism and for that reason it is limited and requires the elimination of the lower racial types. However, this form of fascism is international in scope. It is the end result of the corporate control of the world market systems and its entire financial edifice. There is however an element of race about the serf class in the eyes of the Globalists.

At the end of this little crisis no man will buy or sell save that he has the mark of the Beast and the number of his name. We will choose to serve God or Mammon and we will not be able to do both.

It is not simply that regulators were asleep at the wheel as some journalists and observers have put it. Nor is it “extreme capitalism” as Australian PM Kevin Rudd has termed it. It was a contrived trap set by placing the most vulnerable of the society in positions where they were forced into low interest holidays and high interest subsequent mortgages. The greedy idiots poured money into a US con that saw their own banks forced into bigger and bigger mergers such that the large banks could not be allowed to collapse and the system was set so that if they did it would all collapse and the result was the chaos required to establish the fear and panic to enable the fascist controls of the Last Empire of the Beast.

On 21 October 2008 Eamon Butler wrote in The Australian the sequence of the rot as it was enacted by the US Presidents:

“Indeed, one can date its origin precisely, to October 12, 1977, when US president Jimmy Carter signed the anti-redlining law. Before then, lenders generally denied loans to people in poor neighbourhoods, believing that the local mix of low incomes and a weak housing market would lead to many people defaulting. But the politicians - with good intent - wanted to make home ownership available to all Americans. So lenders were forced into giving out risky mortgages, what we call sub-prime loans.

By 1985, this torrent of bad business had nearly bankrupted the US's savings and loan institutions. So the government took on their bad debt and encouraged them to consolidate, unwittingly making them too big to be allowed to fail.

Meanwhile, several other problems worried the monetary authorities. In 1987, the US stock market plummeted, fearing that other lenders could collapse. There have been other successive crises. Asia's markets sank. Mexico, Argentina and even Russia defaulted on their loans. Over-valued dot com stocks crashed. Then there was 9/11. Each time, Western authorities responded by flooding the markets with cash.

After 9/11, the Federal Reserve took US interest rates down from 6.25 per cent to just 1 per cent, fearing this blow to investor confidence could sink the markets. But, again, its action boosted the wrong market by sustaining the credit bubble.

With loans six times cheaper, mortgage applications soared.

Lenders, awash with the Fed's cash, happily issued more sub-prime loans. With more people buying homes, house prices soared. Buying a house seemed a certain money-maker, so more people got more loans and bought more houses, continuing the spiral.

In London, that other great financial centre, a decade of government overspending saw public debt soaring. Private debt and house prices soared even faster.

So for 10 years, economies boomed, the champagne flowed and everyone had a great party. But it was financed by fake money, printed by the authorities solely to keep the party going. When the realisation broke, the long party turned into the inevitable hangover we suffer today.

The regulators, meanwhile, were unconscious on the floor. The US mortgage institutions, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, had 200 regulators on their case but still went bust for $US5 trillion. These semi-governmental companies allowed investors to believe the bad mortgages were guaranteed by government, causing credit rating agencies to give their dodgy bonds high scores.

Mortgage lenders repackaged these bad debts across the world, but nobody cried foul. Institutions were lending 30 times their asset base. Though the Bank of England knew that the huge mortgage lender Northern Rock was failing, the 2500 staff of Britain's financial regulator seemed to do nothing until it collapsed six months later. Even then, they had no coherent plan.

When the government is persuading the casino to hand out free chips and the regulators are standing drinks at the bar, you shouldn't be surprised if the customers place a few risky bets. It's the management, not the system, that deserves our scorn for breaking the basic rules of economics: there ain't no such thing as a free lunch.

Any sustainable solution has to get finance back to those basics. But the bailout package includes so many treats for special interests that it could save the culprits without helping the victims.

But it's a big world out there. China, the world's fourth biggest economy, continues to grow at nearly 10 per cent. India and other emerging economies are expanding, too. Even with the West in recession, world growth next year will probably be near 4 per cent. That's pretty good.

Western capitalism has been dealt a severe blow by inept politicians and officials. But global capitalism continues to pull hundreds of millions of people out of poverty. It's a great system. Let's not break it.”

Eamonn Butler is director of the Adam Smith Institute think tank, London, and author of Adam Smith: A Primer (2007, IEA, London).

Sorry Eamonn, it was not a goodwill mission by dumb politicians. This was a well planned long term strategy at moving on to a corporate structure of the Beast Power which would come to a crisis and enable the New World Order to be brought into being. All of the capitalist structure of the banks is built on usury and God will have it destroyed before 2027.

George H. W. Bush used the term New World Order in his Presidency. Clinton brought it into operation and set in place the instruments to control the populace. George W. Bush brought it all to the boil. Clinton and McCain were supposed to be the protagonists but Obama makes no difference to the result.

9/11 was the first crisis. The next crisis was the financial collapse of July to September/October 2008. This will enable the restructuring of the World economies. The election in the US in November will see some very surprising things happen.

The US deliberately plundered the world's wealth and the Globalists will now see China promote an Asian EU trade agreement in the next few weeks that will remove the dollar as the basis of trade and destroy the dollars influence on all trade other than with the US itself. This will cause a sell of the dollar and destroy its financial position in world trade.

The fraud committed in the US burnt the world's finances. The world will turn on the US and sink the dollar. The Globalists will have achieved their aim. The Bush administration will be the perpetrators of the destruction of the US system and the hand-over to the Globalist Beast Power, and the Sunday-worshipping religious bigots of the US will have been the ones that put him there to do it.

Before inauguration of the next President there will be some very significant quasi-fascist activities take place that will make the Reichstag fire look feeble.

We have been getting background chatter from politicians. We saw Madeline Albright speak of a generated crisis. Australian PM Kevin Rudd reinvigorated the nuclear debate after a trip to Hiroshima. We are all aware of the current nuclear threat.

In SYDNEY (AFP) it was reported that the world is on the brink of an avalanche in the spread of devastating weaponry, a new global non-proliferation group warned Tuesday (21 October), saying that a nuclear incident would dwarf the September 11 attacks.

The Middle East, particularly Iran, is a potential tipping point, according to Gareth Evans, co-chair of the newly formed International Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament.

Evans, a former Australia foreign minister, said the world had been "sleepwalking" on the issue of atomic weapons for a decade.

‘The devastation that could be wreaked by one major nuclear weapons incident alone puts 9/11 and almost everything else (in) to the category of the insignificant,’ he said, referring to the attacks inflicted on the United States in 2001.

Evans was speaking as the commission, which was first proposed by Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd after a visit to the Japanese city of Hiroshima in June, entered the second and final day of its inaugural meeting in Sydney.

The group, chaired by Evans and Japan's former top diplomat Yoriko Kawaguchi, is tasked with reinvigorating the global debate on the spread of nuclear weapons and disarmament.

Evans told reporters there were between 13,000 and 16,000 nuclear warheads actively deployed around the world and that it was ‘really a bit of a miracle’ that a nuclear catastrophe had not occurred during the Cold War or afterwards.”

Gareth Evans also said that “An Obama administration would, on the face of it... be one that's likely to be more substantially focused on this but even with a McCain administration, it would be an improvement," said Evans. "There's not much to beat frankly." The current opinion of the Bush administration is very low. The Commission is preparing for the 2010 review of the 40 year old Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. However it appears the horse has bolted.

He said if the US were to sign up to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty the implications would be "quite profound" and could lead to China finding itself under "irresistible pressure" to do likewise.

There will be pressures on the US both real and contrived. The stunt of 2004 will not work this time and the Republicans are in a hole now as another bogus tape from the grave by Osama Bin Laden would merely backfire on them, unlike the effect it was allowed to have in 2004 by Kerry’s mishandling of the last one.

There are wars and rumours of wars. The allies of the US are also making comments and asserting that the threats are building. Lord West who is national security advisor to UK PM Gordon Brown is also asserting that these “threats are building.”

The threats facing the US are being allowed to build up from external sources. The Democrats are discussing this new and impending crisis.

Democrat VP candidate Biden is openly discussing the crisis and what Obama as the next President will do about it and you must support him even though it looks as though it might be the wrong thing to do or words to that effect. At a Seattle fundraiser for VIPs on Sunday 19 October 2008 he is quoted as saying:

“I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might originate, And he’s [going to] need help. And the kind of help he’s [going to] need is, he’s [going to] need you - not financially to help him - we’re [going to] need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it’s not [going to] be apparent initially, it’s not [going to] be apparent that we’re right.”

Colin Powell in supporting Obama is also reported as saying (Meet the Press) that there was going to be a generated crisis on 21, 22 January 2009.

Overseas in the Middle East there is an ever increasing likelihood that Israel will attack Iran with US support. In fact the US wants to attack Iran.

French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner among others believes Israel will strike Iran before they can develop nuclear weapons. Israel is ignoring the report of the chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohammed El Baradei, which says that Iran lacks the key components to produce an atomic weapon.

Israel is believed to have 300 to 400 tactical nuclear weapons ready for deployment at a moments notice and is under no real threat from Iran who has never attacked another nation and has a defense budget equivalent to 1% of the United States.

The thing these fascists want is a nuclear strike on one, or more, major Western city to justify the next escalation in the building of the Beast Power of the Last Days.

The well-documented steps to the establishment of a fascist dictatorship in control of the world are these:

1. Invoke a terrifying internal and external enemy

With the Nazis it was the Jews and the Communists and they used the Religious system to their ends.

With the Globalists it is the so-called War on Terror and Terrorists. First the creation of 9/11 and then it was the manufactured financial crisis and finally it will be a staged nuclear event and then controlled war.

2. Create a gulag

The Nazis created the Concentration Camps from 1932 and ended up with the Holocaust. The churches continued it until 1993 in Rwanda and now in the Sudan.

Gulags are under creation with the Terrorist legislation and the destruction of Habeas Corpus.

3. Develop a thug caste

With the Italians and Nazis it was the Brownshirts/Blackshirts and the SS.

With the West it is the civil contractors of Blackwater and the use of foreign troops on other nations including the elimination of the Posse Comitatus Act by recent US legislation and unconstitutional treaties with other nations such as Canada.

4. Set up an internal surveillance system

The Gestapo was the Nazi system using early electronic surveillance.

In the West now it is the most intricate forced espionage and information sharing and legislated reporting using all forms of electronic surveillance. Orwell’s 1984 is already here and it was done by our own people.

5. Harass citizens' groups

All people who object or form for any Human Rights purpose are monitored and harassed. That is now in full swing and misinformation is spread about any person who discusses what is being done.

6. Engage in arbitrary detention and release

Legislation already enacted in US, UK and Australia is as repressive as the Nazi regime under the Fascists.

7. Target key individuals

IBM assisted the Nazis in the compilation of Nazi records.

Now the computer age has enabled massive data keeping never before seen. Google and Yahoo have passed massive amounts of information to the authorities both in China and the US and elsewhere. Many have already been executed.

No one is allowed to hold any key office now in any nation without the support of the Globalists. Hate sites are run to discredit critics based on fabrications and that will escalate. Osama is the Orwellian enemy used to justify control and warfare.

8. Control the press

The media is under the control of an oligopoly and the security agencies. What the Nazis did is being done now on a more comprehensive scale. The US is dumbed down now completely. No one can comment openly except through the Internet and that will be closed as soon as the crisis is initiated.

9. Dissent equals treason

We are now approaching this stage of the process. Dissenters are monitored. There is already arbitrary arrest and imprisonment in a large part of the world. There are Watch lists and No Fly lists already in place and people are placed on them by unscrupulous bureaucrats and cannot be removed.

10. Suspend the rule of law

The last and final phase is being implemented now with the contrivance of the political structure of the West and then finally with the implementation of Martial Law which will soon occur in the US from events occurring from January 2009.

Pray that we are worthy to survive this terrible crisis coming upon us.

Wade Cox

Coordinator General