Christian Churches of God
  Sabbath Message by James Dailly
  Good Sabbath Brethren:
  We are preparing for the reading of the law in 
    2005. We hope to read in Spanish, Russian and Arabic/English. Larger numbers 
    of the Law papers are copied down as we publish on the various language search 
    engines. Initially, we had difficulty getting a Hebrew speaker to translate 
    the papers. One or two began but, as soon as it was realized what was being 
    said, they resigned. It was less over our observations of the principles of 
    the Instructions/Torah than from Sacred Names Theology. 
   Recently a 3068/3069 debate was instigated in the 
    Forum on the grounds that Yahovah and Yahovih are the same, that our research 
    is incorrect and that we should accept the presented correction. Others commented 
    that it is wrong to reiterate what “a man” says. This means that those of 
    us who have verified and believe the CCG’s written Statement of Beliefs 
    are inadequate and can’t comment on our own. This is an insult to all of us 
    and shows no understanding of how we work as an organization. The Moslems 
    we are meeting with over the Calendar and Baptism would agree with that and 
    don’t like our uncompromising stance. However, after many months of review 
    they recently agreed that the New Moon is at the conjunction not the crescent 
    if they only use the Koran, and that yes, they probably should be baptizing. 
    If we are shown to be in error we will modify our written Statement of 
    Beliefs to reflect it. We modified a doctrinal position on the timing 
    of Feast offering from comments made by an unbaptised juvenile. We will 
    need to be shown we are wrong, not simply told that we are wrong.
   Don’t follow “a man” or don’t think on your own 
    was the pronounced undercurrent of the attacks against us. It was suggested 
    our directness was rude although Christ’s bluntness and driving away supposed 
    interested parties was not referenced (John 6:60-66).    
  Most 
    assaults we have received over the past seven years have been noticeably similar. 
    Don’t work together to a common goal, but visit and debate in a pleasant 
    setting with all believing whatever they understand at the time. Don’t 
    put what you believe in writing, eat leavened bread and/or drink grape juice 
    at the Lord’s Supper, Sacred Names Theology & use only Hebrew names, days 
    start at sunrise or sunset not dark, the calendar system is not astronomical, 
    don't keep Passover/Unleavened Bread for eight days, no group fulfillment 
    of the Commission, no tithe or one tithe, all leadership is to be rejected 
    and castigated. The outcome of this thinking is, don’t ever say “thank you” 
    out of respect for all that was learned from studying CCG papers. In 
    every case I am aware of, this has been substantial. The effect of no 
    involvement is no responsibility. 
   We 
    are slaves and try to be profitable and not a drain on the Commission. Many 
    who remain on the outside of membership have spent many years of studying 
    the material we present but, regardless of how aligned they are with the beliefs, 
    they keep themselves unaligned. They feel free of any responsibility to support 
    the Commission and to tithe. This failure may make their baptism invalid. 
    Malachi says they are thieves. All of us benefited from the support of faithful 
    tithe-payers and this more correct presentation receives minimal support and 
    no “thank you” for an improved understanding of the Covenant and Commission.
   This is NOT a solicitation for anyone’s verbal 
    thanks. In fact, those of you who have full time jobs, a family to give time 
    to, and then work to help fulfill the Commission in your free time, the THANKS 
    is for you. If anyone feels the Forum is quiet, it is because most of us are 
    working on some aspect of the Commission and perhaps cannot address the issue 
    at the time. The extensive study papers will aid in your research and probably 
    contain answers you are seeking. What I take from the vowel point issue raised 
    is that it will have to be added to some of the papers, perhaps when we are 
    through with Islam. It is not our responsibility to provide a “knowledge” 
    pill. It is our responsibility to present the Gospel and material for people 
    to learn to “know the Lord.”
  I presume that everyone understands that the English 
    term God is generic and can even refer to Satan (2Cor 4:4). YHVH, 
    Yod Hey Vav Hey is called the Tetragramaton (four letters) in Greek. After 
    the return from Babylon, 
    the consonants YHVH came to be considered too sacred to be pronounced 
    and the word Adonai (Lord) was enunciated instead. 
  Lord was used and not Yahovah 
    in modern translation and many sacred namers today will write God 
    as “G-D” and Lord as “L-rd” in English. The vowel points of Adonai 
    (Lord) were inserted under the consonants YHVH to instruct readers to 
    articulate Adonai (Lord) instead of YHVH. This is false but it 
    had become a death sentence to speak Yahovah YHVH, however it was pronounced 
    anciently. This vowel pointing was never used in ancient Scripture and is 
    principally from Jamnia and with the Massora. It is “modern.” Yaho 
    was used in the Aramaic pronunciation about 419 BCE (see Pritchard, The 
    Ancient Near East p278 as quoted in The Sign of Jonah and the History 
    of the Reconstruction of the Temple (No.13) at www.ccg.org/english/s/p013.html.  Yahweh is modern and incorrect but most 
    accepted. Most of our modern pronunciation would not be readily understood 
    by the original speakers in any language. The English exhortation Yahoo 
    has come down from this ancient term, as “a call to God.” However, if altering 
    a name that identifies an individual actually alters who we worship, 
    we must exercise extreme caution. Vowel points with Yahovah designating 
    Adonai (lord) and Yahovih as Elohim (gods) are incorrect 
    and misleading. This does show that the Jews understood the different 
    beings from the context or they would have used the same vowel points 
    wherever YHVH was written. Modern Hebrew actually allows different consonants 
    to be used for the same name. The earlier mentioned papers # 24, 54, 
    116, and 240 will require some study but are worthwhile.
  The Hebrew terms at issue, without Common Era vowel 
    points that were added after the Jews removal from the land and Temple 
    are below.  
  03068 
    Yahovah {yeh-ho-vaw'}  



  03069 
    Yahovih {yeh-ho-vee'}   


 
  
   
     “a variation of 03068 [used after 0136, and pronounced 
    by Jews as
0430, (Elohim) in order to prevent the repetition of the same sound,
since they elsewhere pronounce 03068 as 0136 (Adonai)” 
  This means it is pronounced “as if” it was a different 
    word and is a deception to confuse who is identified and this is related to 
    Sacred Names Theology.  It is a successful 
    ploy.
  There 
    are 6519 instances of verses containing Strong’s number 03068 and there 
    are 305 instances of verses containing Strong’s number 03069.  See 
    the “Blue Letter Bible” on our website.
  The Name(s) with the vowel points are 
    below. 
3068 hw"hoy> Yehovah
{yeh-ho-vaw'} 
Meaning: Jehovah
= "the existing One" 1) the proper name of the one true God 1a)
unpronounced except with the vowel pointings of 0136 
  3069   hwIhy/ Yehovih 
    {yeh-ho-vee'} 
Meaning: 1)
Jehovah - used primarily in the combination 'Lord Jehovah' 1a) equal to 03068
but pointed with the vowels of 0430 
Origin: a
variation of 03068 [used after 0136, and pronounced by Jews as 0430, in order
to prevent the repetition of the same sound, since they elsewhere pronounce
03068 as 0136];; n pr dei
  03050 Yahh {yaw} 
 (Yah-ho or Yeh-ho in the Aramiac letters.)
  (Yah-ho or Yeh-ho in the Aramiac letters.)
    ”contraction for 03068”
  0430 
    'elohiym {el-o-heem'} 




  0433 
    'elowahh {el-o'-ah rarely (shortened) 'eloahh {el-o'-ah} 



  Brethren, we are not perfect and we are not made 
    of stone. When individuals who do nothing but satisfy intellectual curiosity 
    bring a condemnation, think about the background of what is being presented. 
    We are called abominations before the Father while people who are wolves in 
    sheep’s clothing are accommodated. 
  There are recent witnesses to this extraordinary 
    circumstance, so keep in mind that we can all be readily misled and think 
    deeply about how we speak about the known faithful. 
  The saints of the Most High are being worn out. 
    This is not by adversarial assaults and condemnation, but by brethren who 
    aught to see more clearly. 
  Have a peaceful Sabbath,
  James Dailley
    Deputy Coordinator General
   
   © 
    Copyright 2002 Christian Churches of God, All Rights Reserved